CMMSBuyersGuide Research
Public evidence for better CMMS buying decisions.
CMMS pricing is difficult to understand from vendor quotes alone. Software, implementation, data work, integrations, training, expansion and renewals can appear in different places—and at different points in the life of the system.
We examine public contracts, purchasing records and procurement documents to understand how organizations buy, implement and operate CMMS software.
The goal isn’t to produce an average CMMS price.
It’s to understand what the numbers actually represent.
What does a CMMS actually cost?
What public procurement records reveal about software, implementation and the costs that come later.
We examined documented CMMS purchases to understand where costs appear, why headline prices can be difficult to compare, and what buyers should establish before comparing proposals.
Read the study →Public CMMS procurement database
See the evidence behind the research.
Browse documented software purchases, implementations, expansions, upgrades, migrations and renewals collected from public records.
Each record preserves the status and scope of the amount so that a budget, authorization, award and actual expenditure aren’t treated as though they mean the same thing.
Browse the database →Public procurement profiles
See how CMMS costs develop inside individual organizations.
Follow selected procurements through implementation, expansion, upgrades and renewal, with links back to the original public records.
Browse procurement profiles →Research methodology
How we collect, classify and compare the evidence.
See what enters the dataset, how we distinguish transaction types, why unknown costs remain unknown, and when two documented amounts are—or aren’t—sufficiently comparable.
Read the methodology →The principle behind the research
A CMMS price is only useful when you understand its boundary:
- What does it include?
- What operation does it cover?
- How much time does it cover?
- What could change it?
That’s the standard we use when examining public records—and the standard we think buyers should use when comparing their own proposals.